Jump to content

User talk:Mike Peel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Welcome to my talk page. Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page, use headlines when starting new talk topics and sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. I will generally reply on this page to keep conversations together; please watch this page for a short time after leaving a comment. Uncivil comments will be reverted without response. Thank you.

Start a new talk topic.

If you would prefer to contact me off-wiki, then my contact details and a contact form are available on my personal website.

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tharros, Sardinia 2024 113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:45, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tharros, Sardinia 2024 148.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2024 060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA --Nikride 08:20, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, CA tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:13, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:05, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zdzisław Rychlik (Polish mathematician)

[edit]

"Q102344631" and "Q126330703" is the same person. Regards Gdaniec (talk) 23:59, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merged. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:43, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 425.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Could be a bit brighter, but is ok --PantheraLeo1359531 10:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 09:01, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 23:59, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 426.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 01:37, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Museo Histórico Militar de Canarias 2023 419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 12:46, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 13:59, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 12:47, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 12:54, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:28, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 16:51, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beamish Museum 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beamish Museum 2016 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beamish Museum 2016 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 08:09, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beamish Museum 2016 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 08:09, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beamish Museum 2016 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:26, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Engenho Central do Bracuhy 2018 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida 2019 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cagliari, Sardinia 2019 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:13, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cagliari, Sardinia 2019 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:42, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cagliari, Sardinia 2019 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:44, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cagliari, Sardinia 2019 181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:44, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castello di Sassai 2025 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:52, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]